Executive Overview
Collaboration is being discussed in almost
every business publication today! Many companies are discussing the topic
internally and some have had in-depth discussions amongst their preferred or
necessary business partners. While there are protocols, and transaction sets,
the ability to articulate a universal compelling reason that would effectively
create the collaborative industrial and commercial culture is severely
lacking. In order for collaboration to succeed, there must be a business
culture, universal standards and willingness to make certain information
reasonably available to authorized partners.
Collaboration represents one of the foremost
opportunities in business today; it can drive down costs, improve operations
and performance, culminating in a significant contribution to the profit
line. Of equal importance is that shared information amongst the business
partners positions those partners to participate in the new knowledge base
created by real-time understanding of shared information. As an example, it
is reasonable to conclude that consignees would have better insight regarding
delivery carriers closest to their location, and with shared tracking
information and performance monitoring the business partners would be
empowered with the ability to make more timely and accurate decisions
regarding carrier performance standards and selection. Without collaboration,
this issue may never be solved or solved well after customer service
deteriorated and freight costs exceeded the service negotiated.
Without a corporate collaborative culture in
the business world, effective and efficient collaboration remains on the
horizon. A successful method of approach to address this problem is to
develop a basic definition of collaboration, which is non-threatening, and
broad enough to eliminate the potential of limiting the scope of a viable
description. This method of approach significantly increases the chances for
realizing the abundant and robust opportunities that are both apparent and
developing.
Our previous white papers have spoken about
some of the reasons why collaboration is so important to the continual growth
and development of world wide commerce and industry. This paper will begin to
address:
-
proprietary
concerns and corporate security
-
transportation
and distribution management as the vehicle to drive the collaborative effort
-
collaborative
penetration points, that are reasonably harmless, in the supply and demand
chains
-
available
collaborative technology and concepts
-
strange
bedfellows make excellent collaborators
Collaboration, when successfully achieved can
be one of the most influential components significantly contributing to
growth, development, performance and profitability of the business enterprise,
with the added advantage of developing a new knowledge base.
Definition
Collaboration by definition is, “to work
together, especially in a joint intellectual effort” [1]
. Currently, the commercial and industrial
environments have clearly constrained the true collaborative effort, thus the
opportunities and advantages that will be forthcoming have been delayed. This
constraint, for the most part, is based upon proprietary concerns, corporate
security and the lack of corporate collaborative culture.
The supply and demand chains and the master
link, transportation and distribution management, stand at the threshold of
collaboration and should be the driving force and the basis upon which this
new frontier will be crossed and developed.
Proprietary Concerns and Corporate
Security
With the introduction of computerized business
systems and for those of us who can still remember EDP (electronic data
processing), astute businesses set out to computerize certain mundane
clerical, repetitive tasks. The process next evolved to the point that
interdepartmental tasks were linked, eventually growing to the point of
establishing total connectivity within an organization, and then incorporating
all of its locations. This was no easy endeavor and one that was absolutely
necessary in our quest for establishing a highly secure, timely and accurate
collaboration capability amongst a myriad of business partners with
interdisciplinary relationships; best described by considering the entire
gamut of the industrial spectrum. This original model is still in use today.
Giving due consideration to proprietary
concerns, perhaps one of the best places to begin to understand and appreciate
this issue is to look at the original model, linking interdepartmental tasks.
Cleary, the level of concern could be different, but the concepts should
remain constant. As an example, one question that could be raised, “should
the transportation system be shared with accounting, finance, purchasing, and
the reciprocals thereof.”? A next logical question could be, “how much of
the information could be shared and at what times and under what conditions
along with what is the best model for the respective functional distribution
of the information. Answering these questions begins the controls process,
the very same process or model that could be employed when considering the
sharing of information amongst business partners. Shared information, as
described herein, with an enabler equals collaboration.
Another consideration regarding the proprietary
and security issues is venue. That is, what venue best allows for the
efficient, effective and timely flow of authorized information to appropriate
designees at proper times, without encumbering each partners operations and
systems and is secure enough to protect against unauthorized intrusion or
use? The ASP (application service provider), operating on the Internet or
societal systems (closed loop) and intranets (specialized buying and selling
membership organizations) best addresses the venue issue.
Designating authorized users, eligible for
certain information, limited to specific periods of time for the respective
transactions, coupled with appropriate audit trails, at a minimum, could
satisfy security issues.
Contractual relationships that would include
proprietary, confidential and use terms amongst the authorized trading
partners, including all users therein, should reasonably address these
concerns.
Transportation And Distribution
Management As The Vehicle To Drive The Collaborative Effort
The data elements contained in the
transportation and distribution management process and functions are prolific
and could also be considered interdisciplinary. Consider the Bill of Lading,
the Freight Bill and the Delivery Receipt; on the face of these transportation
documents and their electronic equivalents. We have initial data in the Bill
of Lading with such data flowing to the successive documents or their
electronic equivalents with new data continually appended throughout the
process; beginning with pick-pack and continuing with freight staging and
concluding through delivery. Recognizing that the Bill of Lading could be the
culmination of events at the shipping location, including the initial sales or
purchasing, it is reasonable to conclude that the appending data to these
documents or their electronic equivalents also occurs. Therefore, the
referred to data elements are representative of various departments such as;
sales, finance, purchasing, manufacturing, operations, human resources,
transportation, shipping, distribution and logistics. We call this the,
“transportation link”.
It is clear that the business partners are
connected via the transportation link, that is, activity/data at the shipping
being appended through receiving represents the beginning and ending of the
continuous flow of material, in which this corresponding and prolific data is
collateral. For those partners not otherwise physically connected via the
transportation link, the available data produced is sufficient to incorporate
those partners through other means. Collecting and appending the data in the
transaction stream satisfies the demand for the most current and continuously
refreshed data, the absolute basis for successful collaboration.
The data, process and functions described above
form the basis of collaboration. Transportation and distribution are both the
device and the vehicle that position the data to be converted to collaborative
information.
Collaborative Penetration Points, That
Are Reasonably Harmless, In The Supply And Demand Chains
At the outset, utilizing a well established
practice, standard Bill of Lading information would be delivered to available
partners through a neutral ASP. Distribution, in either a push pull or
delivered environment for appropriate authorized partners would also be
handled through the ASP. As the freight moves along externally, the data
would be continuously appended/refreshed and converted to information. The
information is then made available, via the ASP, to authorized users. Based
upon user security levels, subordinated to the effective agreements and terms
of use, the information is properly controlled.
Penetration points for data extraction are
conceptually described as those points in the process when data is appended
and/or refreshed. As an example, the production of a concluded Bill of
Lading, the transmission of a load tender, the creation of an ASN, carrier
pickup and tracing and tracking. These are only examples and differences will
occur from company to company and will also change as relationships and
functions within the process appear.
Defined penetration points for selective data
extraction and subsequent information availability coupled with real-time
communication within the respective business to business partnership, working
together, especially in a joint intellectual effort is the essence of
collaboration.
Available collaborative technology and
concepts
Intranets could be a probable representation of
electronic collaboration; in other instances, some companies are suggesting
that they offer collaborative services; unfortunately, there is very little if
any basis of shared definitions and thus the parties become mired down in
scope creep (the evaluation process without a beginning or an end). Others
have a loose arrangement of products, some in transportation, purchasing,
finance and operations; if connected, integrated and coupled with effective
and efficient communications when combined with security and proprietary
programs might be considered collaborative.
On the positive side, those companies offering
a “simpler is better” method of approach that address incremental
transportation management solutions in an ASP environment, are the best
candidates for the most comprehensive and meaningful collaborative solution.
Incremental transportation management solutions
that include:
and incorporate data collection
in the transaction stream are best positioned to satisfy the cultural and
functional needs for efficient and effective collaboration for worldwide
business partners:
Strange Bedfellows Make
Excellent Collaborators
There are, at least, two areas of interest
within this topic: those who should collaborate and those that need to
collaborate.
Those who should collaborate are best
identified as the business partners that have a material involvement and/or
interest in the supply and demand chains. Those who need to collaborate
are best identified as the business partners that have a material involvement
and/or interest in the transaction. Within both of these descriptions, there
are incidental and occasional collaborations that need to be provisioned for.
Defining the beginning and the end of the supply and demand chains and the
transaction will establish the specific collaborators and assign to each the
information that will be available and under what conditions.
Consider a simple transaction such as, the
buying of a widget. Even in this simple transaction, participants in the
process may not necessarily be those who will collaborate, but at the very
least, they will be data contributors or information gatherers. Therefore, a
distinction between participants and collaborators, corresponding to available
information must be determined early on in the buy/sell process.
Within this hypothetical transaction, the
probable participants (physical or electronic) are: sales, accounting
(credit), inventory control, replenishment, and accounting (accounts
receivable), warehousing, traffic, shipping, receiving, purchasing, accounting
(accounts payable) and customer service. There is a high probability that
there could be more or less participants.
Depending upon the level of integration within
a partner, other departments or business areas that could be involved as
participants are: forecasting and planning, manufacturing, distribution,
finance, treasury, collateral material and human resources.
Conclusion
Collaboration is still on the horizon.
Consistent with the current, collateral evolutionary business process model,
coupled with the establishment of a worldwide commercial and industrial
collaborative culture and reasonably universal business mindset, the real
benefits of collaboration are waiting to be harvested.
Clearly, the business world is interested and I
believe that business professionals recognize the importance of
collaboration. As each business partnership continues to socialize this
subject and invest in the process, and because collaboration is viral in
nature, it is highly probable that collaboration will grow rapidly.
The most successful collaborators will be those
that embrace collaboration early on; they will grow with it efficiently.
Those that are “forced” to collaborate will be relegated to accepting that
which others have developed for their own benefit.
Continuation
Please consider this white paper as a beginning
in this subject area, succeeding white papers will address common issues and
address them with common solutions. We encourage our readers to direct any
specific questions or comments to
papers@transportgistics.com .
Disclaimer
The information presented above represents the
opinion of the author and not necessarily the opinion of TransportGistics,
Inc. nor is it presented as a legal position.
All content copyright by
TransportGistics, Inc. All rights are reserved. The authors of the articles
retain the copyright to their articles. No material may be reproduced
electronically or in print without the express written permission from
TransportGistics, Inc. or the individual authors (papers@transportgistics.com)

[1]
Excerpted from The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language,
Third Edition Copyright © 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic
version licensed from Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V., further
reproduction and distribution restricted in accordance with the Copyright
Law of the United States. All rights reserved.