Y2K was touted as the thing that
would shake the underpinnings of the world if appropriate attention, time
and talent were not dispatched. Budgets were established, consultants were
hired, staffs were increased and of course the programming queue was
extended.
The process to meaningfully
deregulate transportation meaningfully surfaced in 1982 with the undercharge
claim mess. Deregulation continued to evolve over the next thirteen years
concluding on January 1, 1995.
When you think about
transportation and distribution, it doesn’t take long to realize its
importance in commerce and industry. Transportation and distribution are
the life bloodline to the marketplace; without which there is no commerce,
there is no industry and there is no economy, of any kind.
Y2K was important; and
fundamental changes had to be made so that data could be processed.
Deregulation was important and
fundamental changes in the way we manage, source, buy and control
transportation and distribution had to be made so that the orderly,
efficient and effective flow of material would continue.
Managing today’s transportation
and distribution with yesterday’s practices is equivalent to using pre-Y2K
processors and practices to run your computers.
What is Transportation and
Distribution Management Today?
It is highly probable that you
would get as many different answers from as many people asked, but there are
generally accepted functions that can be identified. In many corporations,
shifts in management structures have occurred and rather than write in terms
of typical department descriptions, corporate need seems to be a more
pragmatic approach.
Managing transportation and
distribution effectively and efficiently today requires the necessary
experience, knowledge, expertise, sophistication and technology not only in
this particular discipline but in the related and corresponding business
disciplines. Therefore the approach to addressing today’s transportation
and distribution management practice requires a skill set that can
understand and appreciate a holistic view of the meaning of the flow of
material from the ground through customer satisfaction.
The major changes, since
deregulation in concept and approach that are being addressed in this white
paper are: the holistic view and technology. Because a holistic perspective
is total and all encompassing, a starting or penetration point is always
difficult and may not be uniformly applicable. Generally speaking, one
could begin with how the “typical” commercial and industrial enterprises
need to ship and receive their goods:
-
in the most efficient and effective
manner.?
-
in the most cost efficient and effective
manner.?
-
in the most timely efficient and effective
manner.?
-
in all of the above.?
-
in different requirements than the above.
-
without care or concern.
The above six (6) items are a
sample of the minimum detail that should be studied regarding a needs
assessment. However, those kinds of basic questions drive the balance of
decision criteria for a needs/control profile. We call this a
“needs/control profile” because each need or group of needs will result in
corresponding control functions. As an example, the need to obtain cost
efficient and effective freight rates and charges results in the need to
control such cost. The counterbalance needed for the profile concerns
itself with external issues such as carrier fitness, desired levels of
customer satisfaction, vendor compliance, collaboration, business rules,
legal requirements (weights, measures, hazmat, etc.), liability, performance
standards, service verification, available networks and common formats at
the very least.
Additionally, there are discrete
functions that must be performed under transportation and distribution
management:
-
Transportation Sourcing
-
Transportation Purchasing
-
Carrier Selection/Execution
-
Routing
-
Costing
-
Auditing
-
Payment
-
Tracing
-
Tracking
-
Bill of
Lading
-
Pricing
-
Material
Management
By automating these discrete
functions, and establishing goals in association with the needs/control
profile, it is arguable that one could develop a completely automated
transportation and distribution management system with essentially no
clerical intervention; with intelligent database interrogation
capabilities by management. Clearly, databases would have to be
established, once achieved; the system would collect new data in the
transaction stream as well as collecting new data from its external
database sources. When you think of the proliferation of data/information
from the transaction streams at each of the discrete functions, as an
example, the flow of new carriers from transportation sourcing, or the
data collected from vendor routing requirements, or the performance data
collected from the tracing and tracking flow and how that relates to the
auditing and payment issues, especially if your pricing is based on time
sensitive delivery; it becomes obvious that a strong connection between
data collection, data/information distribution and collaboration begin to
occur.
Collaboration is a major issue
of importance in the new world of transportation and distribution. It is
one of the most critical elements in the latest frontier for improvement;
the sharing of ideas and information across the industrial and commercial
platforms. When you think about the most likely place for collaboration
to occur, it should be transportation. After all, it was transportation,
back in the 1960’s that established the first communications standards
under the TDCC (Transportation Data Coordinating Committee). Further, it
is transportation and distribution data that contains a wealth of
information, both primarily and secondarily. As an example, consider the
primary elements of the Bill of Lading: Origin, Destination, Weight,
Pieces, Nomenclature, Route, Carrier, Date; multiples of these provide
information such as frequency, and other benefits of pattern recognition.
Secondarily, Bills of Lading typically relate to sales orders, invoices,
purchase orders and other instruments that address other corporate areas
of influence such as accounting, finance, operations, manufacturing and so
on. The combination and permutation of these data and the resultant
information is formidable.
Transportation,
Distribution and Collaboration The Partnership for the New Frontier
The Bill of Lading being the
initial transportation document and the subsequent transportation process
being the most prolific data carrying vehicles, one could consider this to
be the platform of collaboration. As an example, the Bill of Lading could
be used to drive:
An ASN
A Load Tender
A freight Cost
A Freight Invoice
A Routing
An incremental part of a
consolidation
A pre-pay and add charge
A shipment
An SKU cost
Et. al.
Collaboratively speaking we
know that the following personnel could be interested:
Carrier
Accounts receivable clerk
Consignee
Shipping supervisor (labor
scheduling, etc.)
Receiving clerk
Cross dock supervisor
Shipment planner
Et.al.
What is collaboration?
There are two interesting
definitions that we have chosen:
-
To work together, especially in a joint
intellectual effort.
-
To cooperate treasonably, as with an enemy occupation
force in one's country.
Unfortunately, much of the
corporate world continues to dwell upon the second definition and this has
had a limiting affect on the first more meaningful definition.
If a key goal of collaboration
is to effectuate a smooth, continuous, cost efficient flow of goods and
information, we believe that this can be achieved with the caution implied
in definition two while essentially operating in the spirit of definition
number one. Simply put, if one only has to divulge pertinent information
to the appropriate source at the correct time and keep such information
highly secure, such process should achieve the objective.
Since collaboration doesn’t
necessarily mean talking or communicating, but clearly means sharing, the
combination of the needs/control profile and the discrete functional
elements provide the essential collaborative platform. If you accept the
description of the platform, then the question that must be answered with
respect to collaboration is, “how do we share certain information, at
certain times, to certain highly defined functions and what methods are
used for the dissemination process and avoid the implication of definition
number 2?”
Answering the Question
We believe the answer to the
question lies in the existing technology. In some cases we have seen a
seamless transition into on-line routing guides, auditing/matching,
tracing and Bill of Lading systems as ASP’s providing embedded, “simpler
is better” partnership participation with highly secure, pinpointed
collaboration. On the other hand, we have seen start, stop type singular
standalone software applications. At the other extreme, we have seen
closed loop or incestuous systems that only speak amongst themselves. In
time, and with the involvement of the world of transportation and
distribution professionals we will continue to evolve, meeting the
challenges of collaboration and tomorrow.
Continuation
Please consider this
white paper as a beginning in this subject area, succeeding white papers
will address common issues and address them with common solutions. We
encourage our readers to direct any specific questions or comments to
papers@transportgistics.com .
Disclaimer
The
information presented above represents the opinion of the author and not
necessarily the opinion of TransportGistics, Inc. nor is it presented as a
legal position.
All content copyright by
TransportGistics, Inc. All rights are reserved. The authors of the
articles retain the copyright to their articles. No material may be
reproduced electronically or in print without the express written
permission from TransportGistics, Inc. or the individual authors (papers@transportgistics.com)